Skip to content

Choosing a probability distribution

Choosing a distribution means matching a random variable to a mathematical model. At A level, the central choice is usually between the binomial distribution, which counts successes, and the Normal distribution, which models continuous measurements.

The context alone does not determine the distribution. First define exactly what the random variable measures, then check the model’s assumptions.

You should be able to:

The first question: what does the variable record?

Section titled “The first question: what does the variable record?”

A random variable is discrete if its possible values are separated, usually because it counts. It is continuous if it can take any value in an interval, usually because it measures.

Random variableTypePossible starting model
Number of defective bulbs among 4040Discrete countBinomial
Mass of a randomly selected appleContinuous measurementNormal, if the shape is plausible
Number of calls until the first saleDiscrete countNeither binomial nor Normal in the usual A-level setting
Time taken to complete a raceContinuous measurementPossibly Normal, but only if the distribution is approximately symmetric

The words number of often signal a count, while mass, height, length and time usually signal a measurement. This is a useful clue, not a proof.

Use these questions in order.

  1. Define the random variable. State what it records and its units, if any.
  2. Determine its support. Is it an integer count, or a continuous measurement?
  3. Test the assumptions. Do not choose a model merely because the variable is discrete or continuous.
  4. Identify the parameters. Give nn and pp for a binomial model, or μ\mu and σ2\sigma^2 for a Normal model.
  5. Check the conclusion in context. A probability must lie between 00 and 11, and an extreme result should have a suitably small probability.

In compact form,

defineclassifycheckparameterise.\boxed{\text{define} \longrightarrow \text{classify} \longrightarrow \text{check} \longrightarrow \text{parameterise}}.

If XX counts successes, write

XB(n,p)X\sim\operatorname{B}(n,p)

only when all four conditions hold:

  • there is a fixed number nn of trials;
  • each trial is classified into success or failure;
  • trials are independent;
  • the success probability pp is constant.

The word success is only a label for the outcome counted. It need not be desirable.

Worked example 1: choosing and parameterising a binomial model

Section titled “Worked example 1: choosing and parameterising a binomial model”

A factory’s production process makes a defective component with probability 0.0180.018. Defects occur independently. A quality controller examines the next 8080 components. Let DD be the number that are defective.

DD is a discrete count. There are 8080 fixed trials, each component is defective or not defective, independence is stated, and the defect probability is constant. Therefore

DB(80,0.018).\boxed{D\sim\operatorname{B}(80,0.018)}.

Its mean is

E(D)=np=80(0.018)=1.44.\operatorname{E}(D)=np=80(0.018)=1.44.

The non-integer mean is not a possible observed count. It is the long-run average number of defects per batch of 8080.

Worked example 2: a count that is not binomial

Section titled “Worked example 2: a count that is not binomial”

Five cards are drawn from a standard pack without replacement. Let AA count the aces drawn.

AA is discrete and there is a fixed number of draws. Each draw can be classified as ace or not ace. However, without replacement:

  • the draws are dependent;
  • the probability of an ace changes after each draw.

For example, if the first card is an ace, the next ace probability is 3/513/51, not 4/524/52. Thus

A is not exactly binomial.\boxed{A\text{ is not exactly binomial}.}

Being a bounded count is necessary for a binomial variable, but it is not sufficient.

A survey asks 200200 independently selected voters whether they support a proposal. Suppose every selected voter has probability 0.630.63 of answering yes. Let SS count yes responses. Choose a model and state its parameters.

Answer

There are 200200 fixed, independent trials, two classifications per response, and constant probability 0.630.63 of a yes response. Hence

SB(200,0.63).\boxed{S\sim\operatorname{B}(200,0.63)}.

A Normal random variable is continuous, symmetric and bell-shaped. Write

XN(μ,σ2),X\sim\operatorname{N}(\mu,\sigma^2),

where

E(X)=μ,Var(X)=σ2,SD(X)=σ.\operatorname{E}(X)=\mu, \qquad \operatorname{Var}(X)=\sigma^2, \qquad \operatorname{SD}(X)=\sigma.

At A level, a question may state that a variable is Normally distributed. In data-based modelling, a Normal model is plausible when observations are approximately symmetric, have one central peak, and show no severe outliers or long tail. Many biological and manufacturing measurements are approximately Normal because numerous small influences combine, but the context by itself never guarantees Normality.

The fill volume VV ml of cartons from a calibrated machine is Normally distributed with mean 10021002 ml and standard deviation 4.54.5 ml.

VV is a continuous measurement, and Normality is stated. Since the second parameter is the variance,

σ2=4.52=20.25.\sigma^2=4.5^2=20.25.

Therefore

VN(1002,20.25).\boxed{V\sim\operatorname{N}(1002,20.25)}.

A common error is to write N(1002,4.5)\operatorname{N}(1002,4.5). In the notation used here, the second parameter is σ2\sigma^2, not σ\sigma.

Worked example 4: continuous does not mean Normal

Section titled “Worked example 4: continuous does not mean Normal”

Let TT be the waiting time from a randomly chosen moment until the next bus. Buses arrive exactly every 1212 minutes.

TT is continuous and, under an idealised random-arrival assumption, every waiting time from 00 to 1212 minutes is equally likely. The distribution is flat rather than bell-shaped. Hence a Normal model is unsuitable.

There is another warning sign: a Normal distribution has a positive, though perhaps tiny, probability of negative values. For waiting times close to zero with substantial spread, that feature can be implausible.

The heights HH cm of adult plants of one variety are modelled by a Normal distribution with mean 7474 cm and variance 36 cm236\text{ cm}^2. State the model and its standard deviation.

Answer HN(74,36),σ=36=6 cm.\boxed{H\sim\operatorname{N}(74,36)}, \qquad \boxed{\sigma=\sqrt{36}=6\text{ cm}}.

Worked example 5: one context, two distributions

Section titled “Worked example 5: one context, two distributions”

The mass of a manufactured tablet is Normally distributed with mean 500500 mg and standard deviation 88 mg. A tablet is underweight if its mass is below 485485 mg. Tablets are produced independently. A packet contains 3030 tablets.

Two different random variables arise.

Let MM be the mass of one tablet. Then

MN(500,82)=N(500,64).M\sim\operatorname{N}(500,8^2)=\operatorname{N}(500,64).

The probability that one tablet is underweight is

p=P(M<485)=P(Z<4855008)=P(Z<1.875)0.0304.\begin{aligned} p &=\operatorname{P}(M<485)\\ &=\operatorname{P}\left(Z<\frac{485-500}{8}\right)\\ &=\operatorname{P}(Z<-1.875)\\ &\approx 0.0304. \end{aligned}

Now let UU be the number of underweight tablets in a packet. This is a count from 3030 independent trials, each with underweight probability p0.0304p\approx0.0304. Therefore

UB(30,0.0304).\boxed{U\sim\operatorname{B}(30,0.0304)}.

For example, the probability of at least one underweight tablet is

P(U1)=1P(U=0)=1(10.0304)300.604.\begin{aligned} \operatorname{P}(U\geq1) &=1-\operatorname{P}(U=0)\\ &=1-(1-0.0304)^{30}\\ &\approx\boxed{0.604}. \end{aligned}

The individual measurement is Normal; the number satisfying a condition is binomial. This distinction appears frequently in multi-stage questions.

A customer repeatedly rolls a fair die until a six appears. Let RR be the number of rolls required.

RR is discrete, but the number of trials is not fixed in advance. Its possible values are

1,2,3,,1,2,3,\ldots,

with no finite upper bound. It is not binomial. It is not continuous, so it is not Normal either. Therefore

neither model is suitable.\boxed{\text{neither model is suitable}.}

You are not required to force every variable into one of the two familiar distributions.

When raw data, a histogram or a summary is supplied, inspect it before accepting Normality.

A Normal model becomes more credible when:

  • the histogram is roughly symmetric and unimodal;
  • the mean and median are close;
  • observations are reasonably balanced on either side of the mean;
  • there are no strong outliers or physical bounds close to the main body of data.

It becomes less credible when the data have a long tail, several peaks, substantial outliers, or a large pile-up at a boundary such as zero.

Two samples of delivery times have the following summaries.

SampleMeanMedianLower quartileUpper quartileMaximum
A31.231.231.031.027.427.435.135.143.043.0
B31.231.224.624.618.318.336.536.5118.0118.0

Sample A has similar mean and median, and its quartiles are approximately balanced around the centre. These facts are consistent with a Normal model, although they do not prove it.

Sample B has a mean much larger than its median and an unusually large maximum. This suggests strong positive skew, so a Normal model is doubtful.

”The question gives a mean and standard deviation, so it must be Normal”

Section titled “”The question gives a mean and standard deviation, so it must be Normal””

Every distribution with finite spread has a mean and standard deviation. These values do not determine the shape.

A binomial variable specifically counts successes in a fixed number of independent trials with constant pp. Shoe size is discrete but not binomial. The number of attempts until a first success is also not binomial.

Measurements can be skewed, uniform, multimodal or bounded in ways that make a Normal model poor.

”Independent means mutually exclusive”

Section titled “”Independent means mutually exclusive””

Independent events may occur together. Mutually exclusive events cannot occur together. Repeated trials in a binomial model must be independent, not mutually exclusive.

”The parameters are just numbers to copy”

Section titled “”The parameters are just numbers to copy””

Interpret them. In XB(n,p)X\sim\operatorname{B}(n,p), nn is the number of trials and pp is the probability of the outcome counted by XX. In YN(μ,σ2)Y\sim\operatorname{N}(\mu,\sigma^2), the second parameter is variance.

For each variable, choose a binomial model, a Normal model, or neither. Give parameters where possible.

  1. XX is the number of heads in 2525 independent tosses of a coin for which P(head)=0.4\operatorname{P}(\text{head})=0.4.
  2. YY is the diameter in mm of a bearing, stated to be Normally distributed with mean 12.012.0 mm and standard deviation 0.030.03 mm.
  3. WW is the number of red counters obtained in 1010 draws without replacement from a bag containing 66 red and 1414 blue counters.
  4. QQ is a customer’s expenditure, which has many values near zero and a long right tail.
Answers
  1. The binomial conditions are stated, so

    XB(25,0.4).\boxed{X\sim\operatorname{B}(25,0.4)}.
  2. This is a continuous measurement and Normality is stated. Convert standard deviation to variance:

    YN(12.0,0.032)=N(12.0,0.0009).\boxed{Y\sim\operatorname{N}(12.0,0.03^2)} =\boxed{\operatorname{N}(12.0,0.0009)}.
  3. Neither. Without replacement, the trials are dependent and the red probability changes.

  4. Neither of these models is justified. QQ is continuous, but the strong right skew contradicts the symmetry of a Normal distribution.

Before committing to a distribution, ask:

Binomial:fixed n, two outcomes, independent trials, constant p?Normal:continuous, approximately symmetric and bell-shaped?\begin{array}{ll} \text{Binomial:} & \text{fixed }n,\text{ two outcomes, independent trials, constant }p?\\[4pt] \text{Normal:} & \text{continuous, approximately symmetric and bell-shaped?} \end{array}

Then state the model completely:

XB(n,p)orXN(μ,σ2).X\sim\operatorname{B}(n,p) \qquad\text{or}\qquad X\sim\operatorname{N}(\mu,\sigma^2).

If an assumption fails, say exactly which one. If evidence is insufficient, do not invent certainty.