Skip to content

Checking answers

Checking is part of solving, not an optional activity after it. A strong check asks whether an answer satisfies the original mathematics and the conditions of the question. Simply repeating the same calculation is weak because it tends to repeat the same error.

For example, if you obtain x=4x=4 from an equation, substitute 44 into the original equation. If you obtain a probability of 1.121.12, reject it immediately because

0P(A)1.0\leq P(A)\leq 1.

The best check is usually quick, independent of the main method, and capable of proving an answer wrong.

You should be comfortable with exact arithmetic and rounding, calculator use, algebraic fluency and mathematical notation.

Use these questions in order.

  1. Did I answer what was asked? Check the requested quantity, form, interval, accuracy and units.
  2. Is the answer possible? Check signs, size, domain, units and contextual restrictions.
  3. Does it satisfy the original problem? Substitute, differentiate, integrate or reconstruct as appropriate.
  4. Can I verify it independently? Use a graph, estimate, alternative formula or reverse operation.

A check need not reproduce the entire solution. It should target the steps most likely to fail.

Many correct calculations lose marks because the final answer does not match the question.

Before moving on, underline mentally or on paper:

  • the quantity required;
  • whether an exact or decimal answer is wanted;
  • the required significant figures or decimal places;
  • any interval, such as 0x<2π0\leq x<2\pi;
  • any condition, such as x>0x>0 or nNn\in\mathbb N;
  • required units and whether a conclusion in context is needed.

Worked example: the correct roots on a restricted interval

Section titled “Worked example: the correct roots on a restricted interval”

Solve

sinx=12,0x<2π.\sin x=\frac12,\qquad 0\leq x<2\pi.

The reference angle is π/6\pi/6. Sine is positive in the first and second quadrants, so

x=π6,5π6.x=\frac{\pi}{6},\quad \frac{5\pi}{6}.

Both values substitute correctly. The value 13π/613\pi/6 also has sine 1/21/2, but it is not in the stated interval. Substitution alone is therefore not a complete check. The domain condition must also be checked.

See trigonometric equations for systematic solution methods.

An estimate gives a target region and catches keying errors, misplaced brackets and unreasonable precision.

Worked example: detecting a calculator entry error

Section titled “Worked example: detecting a calculator entry error”

Evaluate

19.820.203.\frac{19.8^2}{0.203}.

Before calculating,

19.820.2032020.2=2000.\frac{19.8^2}{0.203}\approx \frac{20^2}{0.2}=2000.

The calculator value is approximately

1931.23.1931.23.

This is consistent with the estimate. An answer of 19.312319.3123 or 193123193123 would signal an incorrect power of ten.

An estimate need not be very accurate. Its purpose is to distinguish a plausible scale from an impossible one.

Substitute into the original equation, not a rearranged line near the end. Earlier rearrangement may have introduced or lost solutions.

Suppose solving

2x25x3=02x^2-5x-3=0

gives x=3x=3 and x=1/2x=-1/2.

For x=3x=3,

2(3)25(3)3=18153=0.2(3)^2-5(3)-3=18-15-3=0.

For x=1/2x=-1/2,

2(12)25(12)3=12+523=0.2\left(-\frac12\right)^2-5\left(-\frac12\right)-3 =\frac12+\frac52-3=0.

Both roots satisfy the original equation. A second check uses the sum and product of roots. For ax2+bx+c=0ax^2+bx+c=0,

α+β=ba,αβ=ca.\alpha+\beta=-\frac ba, \qquad \alpha\beta=\frac ca.

Here,

312=52=52,3(12)=32=32.3-\frac12=\frac52=-\frac{-5}{2}, \qquad 3\left(-\frac12\right)=-\frac32=\frac{-3}{2}.

This checks the pair independently. Review quadratic equations if these relationships are unfamiliar.

Some operations are not reversible without conditions. Squaring both sides can introduce solutions.

Solve

x+5=x1.\sqrt{x+5}=x-1.

The square root is non-negative, so first x10x-1\geq0, giving x1x\geq1. Squaring gives

x+5=(x1)2=x22x+1,x+5=(x-1)^2=x^2-2x+1,

so

x23x4=0,x^2-3x-4=0,

and therefore

x=4orx=1.x=4\quad\text{or}\quad x=-1.

Check in the original equation:

x=4:9=3=41,x=4:\quad \sqrt9=3=4-1,

but

x=1:4=22.x=-1:\quad \sqrt4=2\ne-2.

Thus the only solution is

x=4.\boxed{x=4}.

The value 1-1 solves the squared equation, not the original equation.

Check identities at structural and numerical levels

Section titled “Check identities at structural and numerical levels”

An identity must hold for every value in its domain. Testing one value cannot prove an identity, but it can disprove an incorrect one quickly.

Suppose you claim

3x+5(x+1)(x+2)=2x+1+1x+2.\frac{3x+5}{(x+1)(x+2)} =\frac{2}{x+1}+\frac{1}{x+2}.

Recombine the right-hand side:

2(x+2)+(x+1)(x+1)(x+2)=3x+5(x+1)(x+2).\frac{2(x+2)+(x+1)}{(x+1)(x+2)} =\frac{3x+5}{(x+1)(x+2)}.

This algebraic reconstruction proves the identity for x1,2x\ne-1,-2. A numerical spot check, say x=0x=0, gives 5/25/2 on both sides, but this alone would not be proof. See partial fractions for more decomposition checks.

Differentiation and integration check one another.

Worked example: check an indefinite integral

Section titled “Worked example: check an indefinite integral”

Suppose

xex2dx=12ex2+C.\int xe^{x^2}\,dx=\frac12e^{x^2}+C.

Differentiate the proposed antiderivative:

ddx(12ex2+C)=12ex2(2x)=xex2.\frac{d}{dx}\left(\frac12e^{x^2}+C\right) =\frac12e^{x^2}(2x) =xe^{x^2}.

The derivative reproduces the integrand, so the antiderivative is correct. The constant CC disappears on differentiation, which is why the check cannot determine its value.

For

f(x)=x33x29x+5,f(x)=x^3-3x^2-9x+5,

suppose the stationary xx coordinates are 1-1 and 33. Since

f(x)=3x26x9=3(x+1)(x3),f'(x)=3x^2-6x-9=3(x+1)(x-3),

substitution gives

f(1)=0,f(3)=0.f'(-1)=0, \qquad f'(3)=0.

Now classify them. Since

f(x)=6x6,f''(x)=6x-6,

we have f(1)=12<0f''(-1)=-12<0, so x=1x=-1 is a local maximum, while f(3)=12>0f''(3)=12>0, so x=3x=3 is a local minimum. Checking only that f(x)=0f'(x)=0 verifies stationarity, not the classification. Continue with stationary points and curve sketching.

For a definite integral, check:

  • sign: abf(x)dx\int_a^b f(x)\,dx is negative where negative signed area dominates;
  • scale: compare with a surrounding rectangle;
  • limits: reversing them changes the sign;
  • area wording: geometric area cannot be negative.

For example, if 0f(x)40\leq f(x)\leq4 on [2,5][2,5], then

025f(x)dx4(52)=12.0\leq\int_2^5 f(x)\,dx\leq 4(5-2)=12.

An answer of 1717 is impossible even before the integral is recalculated. See definite integrals and areas.

A sketch should agree with every algebraic feature you know:

  • intercepts;
  • stationary points;
  • asymptotes;
  • symmetry;
  • domain and range;
  • end behaviour.

Consider

y=2x+1x3.y=\frac{2x+1}{x-3}.

Rewrite it as

y=2+7x3.y=2+\frac7{x-3}.

This reveals the vertical asymptote x=3x=3 and horizontal asymptote y=2y=2. The intercepts are

x=12andy=13.x=-\frac12 \quad\text{and}\quad y=-\frac13.

A calculator graph that appears to cross x=3x=3 or settle towards y=0y=0 has been entered or viewed incorrectly. A graph is evidence, not a substitute for exact algebra. Window settings and pixel resolution can conceal roots or asymptotic behaviour.

Check numerical methods by their defining property

Section titled “Check numerical methods by their defining property”

An approximate root x=rx=r of f(x)=0f(x)=0 should make f(r)|f(r)| small. However, a small residual alone can be misleading when the graph is very flat or very steep, so also check the required interval or accuracy statement.

Worked example: verify a root to three decimal places

Section titled “Worked example: verify a root to three decimal places”

Suppose r=1.521r=1.521 is proposed as a root of

f(x)=x3x2.f(x)=x^3-x-2.

To justify a root of 1.5211.521 to three decimal places, test the rounding boundaries:

f(1.5205)0.00206,f(1.5205)\approx-0.00206, f(1.5215)0.00228.f(1.5215)\approx0.00228.

Because ff is continuous and changes sign between these values, a root lies in

(1.5205,1.5215),(1.5205,1.5215),

so it rounds to 1.5211.521. Reporting only f(1.521)0.00069f(1.521)\approx-0.00069 suggests closeness but does not by itself establish correct rounding. Learn the full argument in change of sign methods.

Statistical answers have strong built-in constraints.

Every probability must satisfy

0p1.0\leq p\leq1.

Probabilities for mutually exclusive and exhaustive outcomes sum to 11. Also,

P(A)=1P(A),P(A')=1-P(A),

and for independent events,

P(AB)=P(A)P(B).P(A\cap B)=P(A)P(B).

Do not use the last equality unless independence is stated or established.

Worked example: check a binomial distribution

Section titled “Worked example: check a binomial distribution”

Let XB(10,0.3)X\sim\operatorname{B}(10,0.3). A calculation gives

P(X2)=0.3828.P(X\leq2)=0.3828.

The value lies in [0,1][0,1], but that is only a basic check. Since

E(X)=np=3,E(X)=np=3,

a probability somewhat below 1/21/2 for X2X\leq2 is plausible. An independent complement check is

P(X2)=1P(X3).P(X\leq2)=1-P(X\geq3).

Both calculator routes should agree apart from rounding. If they do not, check whether the calculator endpoints are inclusive. Review the binomial distribution.

For a data set:

  • the mean must lie between the smallest and largest values;
  • variance and standard deviation cannot be negative;
  • adding a constant cc to every value adds cc to the mean but leaves variance unchanged;
  • multiplying every value by kk multiplies standard deviation by k|k| and variance by k2k^2.

These checks often expose confusion between variance and standard deviation. See averages and spread.

Check mechanics with units and physical sense

Section titled “Check mechanics with units and physical sense”

Dimensions expose equations that cannot be physically valid. Quantities may be added or equated only when their dimensions agree.

For instance,

v=u+atv=u+at

is dimensionally consistent because

[v]=LT1,[u]=LT1,[at]=(LT2)(T)=LT1.[v]=LT^{-1}, \qquad [u]=LT^{-1}, \qquad [at]=(LT^{-2})(T)=LT^{-1}.

By contrast, v=u+av=u+a is not dimensionally consistent.

Worked example: check a constant acceleration result

Section titled “Worked example: check a constant acceleration result”

A particle starts with velocity u=5 m s1u=5\text{ m s}^{-1} and accelerates at 2 m s22\text{ m s}^{-2} for 44 seconds. Suppose you obtain v=13 m s1v=13\text{ m s}^{-1} and s=36 ms=36\text{ m}.

First,

v=u+at=5+2(4)=13 m s1.v=u+at=5+2(4)=13\text{ m s}^{-1}.

Independently, average velocity under constant acceleration is

u+v2=5+132=9 m s1.\frac{u+v}{2}=\frac{5+13}{2}=9\text{ m s}^{-1}.

Hence

s=(average velocity)(time)=9(4)=36 m.s=(\text{average velocity})(\text{time})=9(4)=36\text{ m}.

The second method verifies the displacement without repeating the original displacement formula. See constant acceleration.

Also ask whether the sign is meaningful. A negative velocity indicates direction, not an impossible speed. A negative mass, negative elapsed time in an ordinary model, or coefficient of friction below zero is usually impossible.

Exact values, rounding and calculator displays

Section titled “Exact values, rounding and calculator displays”

Keep exact values during working unless the question requires decimals. For example,

23×62=4\frac{\sqrt2}{3}\times 6\sqrt2=4

exactly. Replacing 2\sqrt2 by 1.4141.414 too early gives only an approximation and can distort later rounding.

If a final answer is required to three significant figures:

  1. retain extra calculator digits during working;
  2. round once, at the end;
  3. state trailing zeros when they communicate accuracy, such as 2.502.50;
  4. include units after rounding.

Check calculator mode as well. Trigonometric work in radians requires radian mode. For example,

sin(π6)=12,\sin\left(\frac{\pi}{6}\right)=\frac12,

whereas a calculator interpreting π/6\pi/6 as degrees will not return 1/21/2.

Reading the same lines again may miss the same sign error. Prefer substitution or a reverse operation.

Correct answers can be awkward, and incorrect answers can be integers. Mathematical conditions, not appearance, decide.

A graph can support an answer and reveal missing solutions, but it usually provides approximate evidence only.

Every root, coordinate, probability or case must be checked. One valid solution does not validate the others.

Squaring, cancelling, taking logarithms, dividing by an expression and using inverse trigonometric functions all impose conditions. Check excluded values and domains explicitly.

For a short question, use a ten-second check:

  1. Read the final sentence again.
  2. Check sign, scale, domain and units.
  3. Substitute or reverse one decisive step.
  4. Check rounding and presentation.

For a long question, use earlier parts. If part (b) gives a value for use in part (c), your result in part (b) should be compatible with it. If later working produces an impossible value, trace back to the earliest point at which a restriction was violated.

Try these without looking back.

  1. A solution of ln(x2)=0\ln(x-2)=0 is reported as x=1x=1. Give two reasons it is wrong.
  2. A student finds 02(3x2+1)dx=10\int_0^2(3x^2+1)\,dx=10. Check the answer.
  3. A probability calculation gives P(A)=0.62P(A)=0.62 and P(A)=0.41P(A')=0.41. What is wrong?
  4. A particle has u=12 m s1u=12\text{ m s}^{-1}, v=4 m s1v=4\text{ m s}^{-1} and constant acceleration for 33 seconds. Check the proposed displacement s=24 ms=24\text{ m} independently.
  5. Explain why testing x=2x=2 cannot prove that two expressions are identical.
  1. The domain requires x2>0x-2>0, so x>2x>2. Also, substitution gives ln(1)\ln(-1), which is not defined over the reals. In fact, ln(x2)=0\ln(x-2)=0 gives x2=e0=1x-2=e^0=1, so x=3x=3.

  2. An antiderivative is x3+xx^3+x. Therefore

    [x3+x]02=8+2=10,[x^3+x]_0^2=8+2=10,

    so the answer is correct. It is also plausible because the integrand is positive on [0,2][0,2].

  3. Complements must sum to 11, but 0.62+0.41=1.030.62+0.41=1.03. At least one value is wrong or has been rounded far too severely.

  4. The average velocity is (12+4)/2=8 m s1(12+4)/2=8\text{ m s}^{-1}. Hence s=8(3)=24 ms=8(3)=24\text{ m}, so the proposed displacement is correct.

  5. Agreement at one input proves only that the expressions have the same value there. Different functions can intersect. An identity requires algebraic proof for every value in the common domain.

Build checks into your method selection with problem solving. Then practise checking in topic-specific settings through quadratics, definite integrals, probability and mechanics modelling.